Game Rating Controversy: LocalThunk Challenges PEGI's Classification of Balatro

The rating systems for video games often spark debate among developers and players alike, particularly when it comes to how those systems evaluate content. In this instance, the developer of Balatro, LocalThunk, has voiced his dissatisfaction with the PEGI +18 rating assigned to his game because of its incorporation of poker elements.

LocalThunk humorously suggested that if his game were to include microtransactions or loot boxes similar to those found in EA Sports FC 25, it might warrant a downgrade to a +3 rating. The controversy arises from the belief that Balatro, by teaching certain skills associated with poker, could impart knowledge relevant to real-world gambling scenarios.

He pointed out an inconsistency within the rating system, contrasting his game's rating with that of EA Sports FC 25, which permits gameplay for children aged 3 and up despite involving random card packs and microtransactions. In contrast, Balatro has been categorized as unsuitable for a younger demographic even though it does not engage in gambling or real-money betting. LocalThunk's perspective is that titles with genuine gambling elements should receive appropriate ratings that reflect their actual content.

Given this conversation, one could inquire whether PEGI should reconsider its rating criteria to more accurately represent games that incorporate real-world gambling mechanics.